Table 2.
Results across all users for BioCreAtIvE Task 2.2.
User, Run | # results | "perfect" | "generally" |
4, 1 | 661 | 78 (11.80%) | 49 (7.41%) |
7, 1 | 153 | 1 (0.65%) | 1 (0.65%) |
7, 2 | 384 | 19 (4.95%) [1] | 9 (2.34%) [1] |
7, 3 | 263 | 2 (0.76%) | 10 (3.80%) |
9, 1 | 28 | 9 (32.14%) | 3 (10.71%) |
9, 2 | 41 | 14 (34.15%) | 1 (2.44%) |
9, 3 | 41 | 14 (34.15%) | 1 (2.44%) |
10, 1 | 120 | 35 (29.17%) | 8 (6.67%) |
10, 2 | 86 | 24 (27.91%) | 6 (6.98%) |
10, 3 | 116 | 37 (31.90%) | 11 (9.48%) |
15, 1 | 502 | 3 (0.60%) | 8 (1.59%) |
15, 2 | 485 | 16 (3.30%) | 26 (5.36%) |
17, 1 | 247 | 52 (21.05%) [1] | 23 (9.31%) [0] |
17, 2 | 55 | 1 (1.82%) | 0 (0.00%) |
17, 3 | 99 | 1 (1.01%) | 1 (1.01%) |
20, 1 | 673 | 20 (2.97%) | 30 (4.46%) |
20, 2 | 672 | 38 (5.65%) | 26 (3.87%) |
20, 3 | 673 | 58 (8.62%) | 27 (4.01%) |
Evaluation results on the evidence text selected for Task 2.2. See legend for Table 1. In this task, evaluation of the GO node reference was done with respect to the predicted GO annotation provided by the system.