Skip to main content
. 2005 May 24;6(Suppl 1):S20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S20

Table 2.

Results across all users for BioCreAtIvE Task 2.2.

User, Run # results "perfect" "generally"
4, 1 661 78 (11.80%) 49 (7.41%)
7, 1 153 1 (0.65%) 1 (0.65%)
7, 2 384 19 (4.95%) [1] 9 (2.34%) [1]
7, 3 263 2 (0.76%) 10 (3.80%)
9, 1 28 9 (32.14%) 3 (10.71%)
9, 2 41 14 (34.15%) 1 (2.44%)
9, 3 41 14 (34.15%) 1 (2.44%)
10, 1 120 35 (29.17%) 8 (6.67%)
10, 2 86 24 (27.91%) 6 (6.98%)
10, 3 116 37 (31.90%) 11 (9.48%)
15, 1 502 3 (0.60%) 8 (1.59%)
15, 2 485 16 (3.30%) 26 (5.36%)
17, 1 247 52 (21.05%) [1] 23 (9.31%) [0]
17, 2 55 1 (1.82%) 0 (0.00%)
17, 3 99 1 (1.01%) 1 (1.01%)
20, 1 673 20 (2.97%) 30 (4.46%)
20, 2 672 38 (5.65%) 26 (3.87%)
20, 3 673 58 (8.62%) 27 (4.01%)

Evaluation results on the evidence text selected for Task 2.2. See legend for Table 1. In this task, evaluation of the GO node reference was done with respect to the predicted GO annotation provided by the system.