Table 2.
| Phenotype | Total population | Males | Females |
| DM+HBP+LHDL (%) | 9.7 | 10.6 | 8.6 |
| DM+HBP+HTG (%) | 55.9 | 57.1 | 54.6 |
| DM+HBP+Obes (%)a | 50.7 | 45.3 | 55.6 |
| DM+LHDL+HTG (%) | 8.4 | 8.7 | 7.9 |
| DM+LHDL+Obes (%) | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 |
| DM+HTG+Obes (%)a | 33.7 | 31.1 | 36.6 |
| DM+HBP+LHDL+HTG (%) | 7.8 | 8.3 | 7.2 |
| DM+HBP+LHDL+Obes (%) | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.2 |
| DM+HBP+HTG+Obes (%)a | 31.9 | 29.5 | 34.6 |
| DM+LHDL+HTG+Obes (%) | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| DM+HBP+LHDL+HTG+Obes (%) | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| DM + one trait (%) | 20.5 | 21.5 | 19.3 |
| DM + two traits (%) | 35.3 | 36.4 | 34.1 |
| DM + three traits (%)a | 27.2 | 25.1 | 29.5 |
| Overall MetS (%) | 74.4 | 73.2 | 75.8 |
Prevalence of the different phenotypes of MetS in the DIG population by sex.
Sex differences a p < 0.001.