TABLE 2—

Hierarchical Multiple Regression Results for Meeting Sexual Partners Using the Internet and Having Unprotected Oral or Anal Sex With an Internet Partner

	Nagelkerke R2	OR (95 % CI)	P
Met sexual partners using the Internet (n = 270)
Step 1	.32
Age		1.30 (1.12, 1.51)	.001
Blacka		0.11 (0.04, 0.29)	<.001
Hispanic/Latinoa		0.50 (0.34, 1.68)	.498
Other race/ethnicitya		1.01 (0.34, 3.00)	.977
HIV positive		1.70 (0.57, 5.08)	.340
Step 2	.48
History of STIs		1.14 (0.42, 8.53)	.785
Commercial sexual activity		1.35 (0.59, 3.07)	.474
Marijuana use (past 12 mo)		1.11 (0.58, 2.12)	.758
Viagra use (past 12 mo)		0.39 (0.88, 3.07)	.210
Methamphetamine use (past 12 mo)		1.13 (0.38, 3.35)	.821
Multiple anal intercourse partners (past 3 mo)		3.59 (1.72, 7.46)	.001
Unprotected anal intercourse (past 12 mo)		2.20 (1.11, 4.37)	.024
Sexual activity at sex club or bathhouse		2.88 (1.21, 6.82)	.016
Had unprotected oral or anal sex with internet partner (n = 129)
Step 1	.01
Age		0.99 (0.81, 1.22)	.991
Blacka		0.58 (0.16, 2.11)	.411
Hispanic/Latinoa		0.87 (0.32, 2.34)	.782
Other race/ethnicitya		0.71 (0.22, 2.26)	.562
HIV positive		0.81 (0.28, 2.38)	.699
Step 2	.25
Commercial sexual activity		2.34 (0.93, 5.87)	.072
Methamphetamine use		2.24 (0.77, 6.55)	.141
Viagra use		1.84 (0.39, 8.64)	.437
Unprotected anal intercourse (past 12 mo)		3.42 (1.55, 7.57)	.002

Note. OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, STI = sexually transmitted infection.

^aWhite race/ethnicity was the reference category.