TABLE 3—

Reports Regarding Sex-Related Topics Among Adolescent Boys at Follow-Up Interview, by Study Group: REAL Men, 2000–2004

	3-Month Follow-Up			6-Month Follow-Up			12-Month Follow-Up
Adolescents’ Outcomes	Meana (SD)	Pb	95% CIc	Mean (SD)	Pb	95% CIc	Mean (SD)	Pb	95% CIc
Discussion of sex-related topicsd
Intervention	23.19 (12.57)	.094	−1.07, 6.59	22.73 (13.91)	.111	−0.49, 3.45	23.63 (12.50)	.080	−0.57, 7.52
Controle	20.54 (13.51)			21.93 (14.35)			20.02 (13.73)
Intimate behaviorsd
Intervention	3.50 (2.68)	.083	−2.07, 0.24	3.99 (2.64)	.050	−1.48, −0.02	4.42 (2.67)	.217	−1.48, 0.64
Controle	4.25 (2.75)			4.62 (2.69)			4.61 (2.96)
Sexual abstinence rate, proportion
Intervention	0.81	.160	−0.06, 0.18	0.75	.050	0.00, 0.11	0.67	.380	−0.11, 0.08
Controle	0.75			0.69			0.68
Intentions about having sexual intercourse,f proportion
Intervention	0.45	.110	−0.06, 0.29	0.52	.140	−0.10, 0.39	0.42	.040	0.00, 0.17
Controle	0.34			0.38			0.34
Ever had sexual intercourse without a condom,g proportion
Intervention	0.23	.060	−.50, .02	0.32	.120	−.42, −.07	0.23	.030	−.61, −.06
Controle	0.48			0.57			0.57

Note. CI = confidence interval. For intervention group, n = 121; for control group, n = 119.

^aAdjusted for father–adolescent living status.

^bOne-tailed probability t statistic for means and χ² statistic for proportions.

^cOne-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between the 2 groups.

^dFor scores, see under “Measures” in “Methods” section.

^e The control group participated in a nutrition and exercise program

^fOnly those who have not had sexual intercourse are included; value reflects the proportion who will delay sexual intercourse until marriage.

^gOnly those who have had sexual intercourse are included; value reflects the proportion who responded yes.