Skip to main content
. 2002 Oct;54(4):363–371. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01654.x

Table 2.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of carbidopa after administering of placebo or entacapone 200 mg with different doses of l-dopa/carbidopa.

Cmax (ng ml−1) tmax (h) AUC (0,12h) (ng ml−1 h)
l-dopa/carbidopa dose (mg) Placebo Entacapone Placebo Entacapone Placebo Entacapone
 50/12.5 39 ± 23 40 ± 19 1.9 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 0.7 132 ± 92 121 ± 76
(-0.22, 0.93) (-0.37, 1.16)
100/10 31 ± 18 33 ± 15 2.3 ± 0.9 2.0 ± 0.6 95 ± 71 93 ± 66
(-0.18, 0.91) (-0.56, 0.97)
100/25 82 ± 33 76 ± 35 2.4 ± 0.9 2.8 ± 0.9 335 ± 147 313 ± 161
(-0.63, 046) (-0.87, 0.67)
150/37.5 113 ± 40 111 ± 39 2.3 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.9 484 ± 170 550 ± 226
(-0.63, 0.56) (-0.70, 0.88)
200/50 126 ± 45 132 ± 38 3.2 ± 1.0 2.9 ± 0.7 586 ± 243 670 ± 193
(-0.41, 0.47) (-0.49, 0.72)
250/25 54 ± 27 69 ± 25 3.2 ± 1.5 3.8 ± 1.1 229 ± 118 321 ± 151
(-0.03, 0.85) (-0.10, 1.11)

Values are means with s.d., n = 14–16; 95% confidence intervals on the differences between the mean values for entacapone vs placebo are given in parentheses. There were no statistically significant differences between entacapone and placebo. Statistical significance was concluded if the 95% confidence interval excluded 0.