Table 4.
Results of logistic regression to predict engagement
| Factor | Odds Ratio (CI) | Beta | SE | P value |
| Predictors of Initial Engagement (N = 2276) | ||||
| Nourish (vs non) | 0.02 (0.02-0.03) | −3.78 | 0.18 | < .001 |
| Achieve (vs non) | 0.17 (0.12-0.23) | −1.79 | 0.17 | < .001 |
| Nourish × Achieve (Balance only) | 3.97 (2.49-6.32) | 1.38 | 0.24 | < .001 |
| Baseline BMI | 0.99 (0.97-1.00) | −0.02 | 0.01 | .10 |
| Age | 1.01 (1.00-1.02) | 0.01 | 0.01 | .27 |
| Female | 1.68 (1.27-2.22) | 0.52 | 0.14 | < .001 |
| Ethnicity (see below) | .10 | |||
| Diabetes diagnosis (vs non) | 0.94 (0.73-1.20) | −0.07 | 0.13 | .60 |
| CAD diagnosis (vs non) | 1.16 (0.83-1.60) | 0.14 | 0.17 | .39 |
| Self-efficacy | 0.95 (0.85-1.06) | −0.06 | 0.06 | .32 |
| Motivation | 1.03 (0.97-1.10) | 0.03 | 0.03 | .27 |
| Predictors of Ongoing Engagement (N = 2276) | ||||
| Nourish (vs non) | 0.09 (0.06-0.12) | −2.46 | 0.18 | < .001 |
| Achieve (vs non) | 0.34 (0.27-0.44) | −1.07 | 0.13 | < .001 |
| Nourish × Achieve (Balance only) | 2.04 (1.19-3.48) | 0.71 | 0.27 | .009 |
| Baseline BMI | 0.99 (0.97-1.01) | −0.01 | 0.01 | .44 |
| Age | 1.02 (1.01-1.03) | 0.02 | 0.01 | .001 |
| Female | 1.50 (1.12-2.01) | 0.41 | 0.15 | .006 |
| Ethnicity | .04 | |||
| White (vs non) | 1.18 (0.92-1.51) | 0.16 | 0.13 | .20 |
| Black / African American (vs non) | 0.68 (0.47-0.97) | −0.39 | 0.18 | .03 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 0.88 (0.56-1.38) | −0.13 | 0.23 | .57 |
| Diabetes diagnosis (vs non) | 0.97 (0.76-1.25) | −0.03 | 0.13 | .81 |
| CAD diagnosis (vs non) | 1.01 (0.73-1.40) | 0.01 | 0.17 | .97 |
| Self-efficacy | 0.84 (0.75-0.95) | −0.17 | 0.06 | .003 |
| Motivation | 1.07 (1.00-1.14) | 0.07 | 0.03 | .04 |