Skip to main content
. 2002 Oct;12(10):1523–1532. doi: 10.1101/gr.323602

Table 3.

Phylogenetic Footprinting Results for Selected Species Combinationsa

Speciesb Number of orthologous data sets Motif predictions with all species included Correspondence with known sitesc




EC-ST 161 98.8% (159/161) 55.3% (88/159)
EC-YP 138 94.2% (130/138) 66.9% (87/130)
EC-VC 112 83.0% (93/112) 62.4% (58/93)
EC-HI 72 81.9% (59/72) 62.7% (37/59)
EC-SO 91 69.2% (63/91) 55.6% (35/63)
EC-PA 92 48.9% (45/92) 37.8% (17/45)
EC-BU 27 85.2% (23/27) 39.1% (9/23)
EC-AF 46 58.7% (27/46) 48.1% (13/27)
EC-XF 50 54.0% (27/50) 33.3% (9/27)
EC-VC-HI 65 50.8% (33/65) 75.8% (25/33)
EC-YP-SO 86 36.0% (31/86) 67.7% (21/31)
EC-YP-PA 86 19.8% (17/86) 70.6% (12/17)
EC-ST-YP-VC 103 42.7% (44/103) 86.4% (38/44)
a

Results for all species combinations are in the Supplementary Data. 

b

Species abbreviations are as follows: EC, Escherichia coli; ST, Salmonella typhi; YP, Yersinia pestis; VC, Vibrio cholerae; HI, Haemophilus influenzae; SO, Shewanella oneidensis; PA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; BU, Buchnera sp.; AF, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans; and XF, Xylella fastidiosa. 

c

Correspondence with known E. coli transcription factor binding sites was calculated only for those motif predictions that contained sites from all the species included in the data set.