. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 May 24.

Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Aug;21(8):1248–1255. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060514

Table 1.

Parameter estimates (SE) for the strength – bone volume fraction and elastic modulus –bone volume fraction characteristics are shown for the original models, those with non-targeted cavities and those with targeted cavities. Multiple comparisons were performed with the Holm test.

	σ_y = a + b (BV/TV)		E = c + d (BV/TV)		σ_y/(BV/TV)	E/(BV/TV)	ε_y
	a	b	c	d	σ_y/(BV/TV)	E/(BV/TV)	ε_y
Original	−0.27 (0.55)	25.98^* (4.71)	−31.14 (65.33)	4105^* (556.39)	22.98^* (1.43)	3763.03^* (172.08)	0.80%^* (0.02)
Non- Targeted	−0.34 (0.43)	24.11^* (4.36)	−40.55 (57.85)	3868^* (523.70)	20.23^* (1.34)	3409.83^* (166.23)	0.79%^* (0.02)
Targeted	−0.45 (0.42)	19.45^* (3.84)	−68.13 (54.48)	3444^* (493.23)	14.50^* (1.23)	2694.10^* (172.81)	0.73%^* (0.02)

- p < 0.05 v. both other model types