TABLE 3.
Sample | ΔmVoigt* (ng/cm2) | ΔmSPR† (ng/cm2) | Water content (mass %) | ρVoigt‡ (g/dm3) | dVoigt‡ (nm) | ηVoigt‡ (mPa/s) | μVoigt‡ (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERE | 655 | 102 | 84 | 1069 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 0.19 |
Ctrl ERα-ERE | 1470 | 755 | 49 | 1168 | 12.6 | 4.3 | 0.55 |
E2-ERα-ERE | 1270 | 516 | 59 | 1133 | 11.2 | 3.4 | 0.42 |
4OHT-ERα-ERE | 1155 | 319 | 72 | 1093 | 10.6 | 2.4 | 0.23 |
ΔmVoigt value is obtained through viscoelastic modeling using the Voigt model for a one-layer film (see Materials and Methods).
ΔmSPR value calculated from their corresponding angle shift using the de Feijter formula with a conversion factor of 833 ng/(cm2/deg) for proteins (corresponding to dn/dc = 0.18) and 789 ng/(cm2/deg) for DNA (corresponding to dn/dc = 0.19).
The effective density of the film was calculated by weighting from the modeled and measured masses ΔmVoigt and ΔmSPR, using a density of 1000, 1350, and 1700 g/dm3 for buffer, protein, and DNA, respectively (see Materials and Methods). This density was used in a subsequent iteration of modeling to find dVoigt, ηVoigt, and μVoigt.