Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 30;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-4-10

Table 2.

Lymphocytic thyroiditis – Contrasted and compared with some of the previous studies

Author No. of Pts Age (yrs) Sex Cytologic diagnosis Clinical Presentation Hormonal changes (%) TMA (%) RAIU USG Cytological grading

Diffuse Nodular
Kumar et al10 55 7–45 55F All LT 81.8% 18.2% 72 83.6 - - Mild = 61.90%
Mod. to
Heavy = 38.1%
Nguyen et al11 146 15–70 139F
7M
All LT 71.92% 28.08% 35 - - - -
Kini et al22 87 - - 60LT (17on biopsy) 78.16% - 49.33 61.64 ↓ in nodules - -
Friedman et al12 40 18–71 33F
7M
All LT 5% 80% 7.5 75 ↑ = 2.5%
↓ = 50%
N = 47.5%
- -
Jayaram et al2 40 40–50 40F 37LT - - 45 57.5 n = 10
All thyrotoxic
↑ = 100%
n = 30
Hypo- anechoic
n = 37
I = 13.51%
II = 62.16%
III = 24.32%
Bhatia et al 76 6–60 70F
6M
75 LT 89.47% 2.63% 98.68 n = 70
65.71
n = 65
↑ = 18.46%
↓ = 30.77%
N = 50.77%
n = 48
micro nodules
n = 75
Grade I = 38.67%
Grade II = 44%
Grade III = 17.33%

LT = Lymphocytic thyroiditis, F = Females, M = Males, TMA = Thyroid microsomal antibodies, RAIU = Radioactive iodide uptake, USG = Ultrasonography, ↓ = decreased, ↑ = increased, N = Normal Pts = Patients