Table 4.
Log likelihoods of l-dopa causing a swivel versus a shift in saccadic latency distributions (see Fig. 1)
| Subject no. | Log likelihood swivel vs shift |
|---|---|
| P1 | 1.9 |
| P2 | 1.3 |
| P3 | 0.5 |
| P4 | −2.2 |
| P5 | 0 |
| P6 | −0.3 |
| P7 | 0.2 |
| P8 | −1.1 |
| P9 | 1.5 |
| P10 | 6.8 |
| P11 | −0.2 |
| P12 | 0.1 |
| P13 | 2 |
| P14 | 0.2 |
| P15 | 0.5 |
| Sum | 11.2 |
The sum of 11.2 strongly suggests that l-dopa causes a swivel of the distribution of saccadic latencies about the infinity intercept rather than a parallel shift (a high number favours swivel)