Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 23;334(7603):1098. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39164.568183.AE

Table 3.

 Mean EQ-5D scores, health visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and Minnesota living with health failure questionnaire (MLHFQ) scores for groups at baseline and at three months' and six months' follow-up

Intervention group Control group Adjusted mean difference (95% CI); P value*
Score (SD) No of respondents Score (SD) No of respondents
EQ-5D at baseline† 0.58 (0.32) 147 0.57 (0.34) 144
EQ-5D at 3 months† 0.54 (0.33) 113 0.51 (0.37) 100
EQ-5D at 6 months† 0.58 (0.29) 108 0.52 (0.34) 104 0.07 (−0.01 to 0.14); P=0.08
VAS at baseline† 56.6 (19.0) 143 56.9 (19.6) 140
VAS at 3 months† 58.4 (20.8) 107 52.9 (21.9) 96
VAS at 6 months† 58.2 (19.6) 105 58.6 (19.8) 102 −0.93 (−6.05 to 4.20); P=0.72
MLHFQ at baseline‡ 45.9 (24.4) 139 46.1 (23.9) 136
MLHFQ at 3 months‡ 49.6 (28.4) 85 54.4 (26.4) 71
MLHFQ at 6 months‡ 47.7 (26.3) 78 44.5 (27.9) 80 3.73 (−3.67 to 11.13); P=0.32

*Based on analysis of covariance comparing results at six months adjusted for baseline score, site, and New York Heart Association class.

†High scores imply better health.

‡Low scores imply better health.