Table 3.
Methodological quality of included studies
| CBA Methodological Quality Assessment Results and Rating | |||||||||||
| First Author | Unit of Allocation | Unit of Analysis | Power Calculation | Baseline Measure | Characteristics of Control | Blinded Outcome Assessment | Protection Against Contamination | Reliable Outcomes Measure | Provider Follow | Patient Follow Up | Rating |
| Tsa i [27] | Provider | Provide r | NC | √ | √ | X | NC | X | √ | n/a | Low |
| RCT Methodological Quality Assessment Results and Rating | |||||||||||
| First Author | Unit of Allocation | Unit of Analysis | Power Calculation | Baseline Measure | Allocation Concealment | Blinded Outcome Assessment | Protection Against Contamination | Reliable Outcomes Measure | Provider Follow Up | Patient Follow Up | Rating |
| Dufault [24] | Ward | Provider * | NC | X | NC | X | √ | X | NC | n/a | Low |
| Hong [25] | Ward | Provider * | NC | √ | √ | X | √ | X & NC | NC | n/a | Low |
| Tranme r [26] | Ward | Provider * | NC | X | NC | X | √ | X | NC | n/a | Low |
√:Done
X: Not Done
NC: Not Clear
* Unit of analysis error
4/8 or less – low quality
5/8–6/8 – medium quality
7/8 or higher – high quality