Table 2.
Parameters | CON | FRU | FRU + CAR | CON + CAR |
| ||||
LHP (A) | 1.64 ± 0.14 | 2.27 ± 0.19 (a) | 1.74 ± 0.15 (b) | 1.55 ± 0.09 |
TBARS (A) | 1.69 ± 0.11 | 2.20 ± 0.22 (a) | 1.67 ± 0.08 (b) | 1.52 ± 0.13 |
CD (A233/A215) | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.92 ± 0.07 (a) | 0.66 ± 0.05 (b) | 0.60 ± 0.03 |
Protein carbonyl groups (A) | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.02 (a) | 0.25 ± 0.03 (b) | 0.22 ± 0.14 |
Aldehyde (B) | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.61 ± 0.05 (a) | 0.50 ± 0.03 (b) | 0.49 ± 0.05 |
Values are means ± SD of 6 rats from each group. CON—control rats; FRU-fructose-fed rats; FRU + CAR—fructose fed rats treated with carnitine; CON + CAR—control rats treated with carnitine. (A) μmol/mg protein; (B) μmol quinine sulphate equivalents/g tissue.
(a)Significant as compared to CON (P < .05; ANOVA followed by DMRT).
(b)Significant as compared to FRU (P < .05; ANOVA followed by DMRT).