Table 3.
Parameters | CON | FRU | FRU + CAR | CON + CAR |
| ||||
SOD (Units (A) ) | 3.39 ± 0.33 | 2.35 ± 0.20 (a) | 3.11 ± 0.13 (b) | 3.33 ± 0.22 |
CAT (Units (B) ) | 44.85 ± 3.74 | 31.36 ± 2.19 (a) | 42.15 ± 3.86 (b) | 46.18 ± 3.47 |
GPx (Units (B) ) | 5.25 ± 0.27 | 4.21 ± 0.42 (a) | 4.97 ± 0.47 (b) | 5.44 ± 0.41 |
GST (Units (C) ) | 4.15 ± 0.29 | 3.55 ± 0.33 (a) | 4.08 ± 0.18 (b) | 4.22 ± 0.18 |
Values are means ± SD of 6 rats from each group. CON-control rats; FRU—fructose-fed rats; FRU + CAR—fructose fed rats treated with carnitine; CON + CAR—control rats treated with carnitine. (a)Significant as compared to CON (P < .05; ANOVA followed by DMRT). (b)Significant as compared to FRU (P < .05; ANOVA followed by DMRT). (A)amount of enzyme which gave 50% inhibition of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction/mg protein; (B)mol substrate/min/mg protein; (C)nmoles of glutathione-1-chloro, 2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) conjugate formed/min/mg protein.