Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun;55(6):609–615. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01813.x

Table 3.

Results after run-in, placebo and montelukast, and difference between randomized treatments.

Post run-in Placebo Montelukast Difference between montelukast and placebo (95% CI)
Methacholine PD20 (µg) 63 (15) 61 (16) 94 (25)* 1.6 fold (1.1, 2.5)
FEV1 % predicted 76 (3) 71 (3) 78 (3)* 7 (3, 12)
FEF25-75 % predicted 42 (3) 39 (3) 47 (4)* 8 (4, 12)
Morning PEF (l min−1) 437 (22) 419 (22) 436 (21)* 17 (6, 28)
Evening PEF (l min−1) 442 (23) 426 (22) 443 (22)* 17 (8, 26)
Daytime reliever use (puffs) 1.4 (0.4) 1.8 (0.4) 1.0 (0.4)* 0.8 (0.1, 1.4)
Night time reliever use (puffs) 1.0 (0.6) 1.6 (0.4) 0.6 (0.2)* 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Daytime symptoms (units) 0.6 (0.1) 0.6 (0.1) 0.3 (0.1)* 0.3 (0.1, 0.5)
Night time symptoms (units) 0.5 (0.1) 0.7 (0.1) 0.3 (0.1)* 0.3 (0.1, 0.6)

Values are shown as means (SE) and mean differences (95% CI) except for methacholine PD20 which is expressed as geometric mean dose (µg) and geometric mean fold difference.

*

Denotes significant (P < 0.05) difference between montelukast vs placebo;

denotes significant (P < 0.05) difference from post run-in value.