Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul;56(1):57–67. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01853.x

Table 3.

The results of pharmacodynamic model building and selection.*

Active moiety Model Number of model parameters Model description -LL AIC
Placebo PD (1)   6 Only placebo effect, with variable scale and shape 1294 2.198
PD (2)   9 As above with variable baseline 1245 2.126
PD (3) 12 As above with variable tlag 1240 2.128
DEX PD (4)   3 Emax with effect compartment 1235 2.351
PD (5)   4 Sigmoidal Emax 1233 2.350
PD (6)   7 As above with variable baseline placebo effect§ 1247 2.344
PD (7) 10 As above with variable extent of placebo effect§ 1218 2.344
PD (8) 13 As above with variable tlag of placebo effect§ 1208 2.337
DOR PD (9)   4 As (5) 1397 2.365
PD (10)   7 As (6) 1268 2.158
PD (11) 10 As (7) 1315 2.247
PD (12) 13 As (8) 1250 2.151
DEX/DOR PD (13)   4 As (4) with competitive effect between DEX and DOR 1332 2.263
PD (14)   5 As (5) with competitive effect between DEX and DOR 1315 2.230
PD (15)   6 As above with variable ke0 for DEX and DOR 1318 2.238
PD (16) 12 As above with variable baseline and effect of placebo§ 1214 2.066
*

For more details see Appendix.

The best-fit model with the lowest AIC value is indicated in italics. ‡ P-value for the statistical significance of improvement in -LL compared with the previous model on the list.

§

These variable effects refer to inter-occasion (IOV) (intra-individual) differences in placebo parameter values between different study arms.