Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;57(2):170–180. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01988.x

Table 2.

Description of the 11 Phase 1 studies and one Phase 2 study analysed.

Study description Design Subjects *Samples Doses/formulations
Single oral dose escalation XO 15 ♂HV 32 0, 1–20 mg SOL
SOL-IR, young-elderly XO 20 ♂/7 ♀HV 10 10 mg IR/SOL
I.v. dose escalation XO  8 ♂HV 71 0, 0.6, 2, 6 mg i.v.
Multiple dose IR-CR XO 13 ♂HV 65 7.5 mg IR TID, 20 mg CRS,CRM,CRF OD
Dose escalation IR-CR XO 26 ♂HV 65 7.5, 15, 30 mg CR OD 2.5, 5, 10 mg IR TID
One tablet CR vs. 2 tablets CR XO 24 ♂HV 30 45 mg, 15 + 30 mg CR
Relative F IR and CR XO 24 ♂HV 59 4 mg i.v., 10 mg IR TID, 30 mg CR OD
Ketoconazole interaction PG 16 ♂HV 19 30 mg CR OD 0, 400 mg ketoconazole
Erythromycin interaction PG 29 ♂HV 18 30 mg CR OD 0, 400 mg erythromycin
Multiple dose SOL PG 16 ♂HV 15 0, 10 mg SOL TID
Multiple dose IR XO 16 ♂HV 36 2.5, 5, 10 mg IR TID
IR-CR in patients XO 30 ♂/18 ♀PTS  8 2.5 mg IR TID, 15, 30 mg CR OD
*

Median number of samples per subject. XO, Cross-over; HV, healthy volunteer; PTS, patient; PG, parallel group; SOL, solution; IR, immediate release; CR, (continuous) extended release; CRS, CR; CRM, medium CR; CRF, fast CR; OD, once daily; TID, 3×/day.