Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul;58(1):26–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02108.x

Table 3. 95% CI for mean difference between CIC and FP, irrespective and respective of sequence.

Irrespective of sequence CIC (first) and FP (second) FP (first) and CIC (second)
NO (p.p.b) −2.1, 7.3 −9.0, 15.6 −4.9, 0.6
FEV1 (l) −0.15, 0.06 −0.17, 0.17 −0.08, 0.23
FEV1 (% predicted) −5, 2 −6, 5 −2, 8
FEF25–75 (l s−1) −0.41, 0.06 −0.32, 0.46 −0.89, 0.18
FEF25–75 (% predicted) −12, 1 −11, 13 −24, 4
Methacholine PC20 (doubling dilution shift) −1.2, 0.4 −1.3, 1.7 −0.1, 1.8
PEF (am) (l min−1) −12, 14 −13, 24 −19, 24
PEF (pm) (l min−1) −11, 17 −13, 29 −22, 22
Asthma symptom score (am) −0.3, 0.1 −0.2, 0.1 −0.2, 0.5
Asthma symptom score (pm) −0.3, 0.1 −0.5, 0.1 −0.3, 0.3
Rescue (am) (puffs/day) −0.4, 0.2 −0.3, 0.3 −0.4, 0.7
Rescue (pm) (puffs/day) −0.3, 0.1 −0.5, 0.2 −0.3, 0.4
Activities (MiniAQLQ) −0.26, 0.92 −0.08, 1.02 −1.27, 0.81
Symptoms (MiniAQLQ) −0.45, 0.56 −0.97, 1.22 −0.60, 0.60
Emotions (MiniAQLQ) −0.76, 0.37 −1.39, 0.47 −0.83, 0.83
Environment (MiniAQLQ) −1.08, 0.02 −0.97, 0.55 −0.10, 1.61
Overall (MiniAQLQ) −0.43, 0.37 −0.60, 0.70 −0.52, 0.70

There were no significant differences for comparisons between CIC vs. FP, either irrespective or respective of sequence.