Table 10. The different consequences of applying models for time-varying covariates, and potential implications for therapy.
Situation | Potential implications for therapy | Examplea |
---|---|---|
Significant improvementb | ||
1 θBCOV≈0cθDCOV ≠ 0 | DCOV superior to COV and BCOV for therapeutic decisions. | Paclitaxel PD, Slope∼BIL |
2 θBCOV ≠ 0θDCOV≈0c | BCOV superior to COV and DCOV for therapeutic decisions. | Pefloxacin, CL∼BIL |
3 θBCOV ≠ 0θDCOV ≠ 0θBCOV ≠ θDCOV | Both BCOV and DCOV useful, but changes within a patient may require larger (|θBCOV | < |θDCOV|) or smaller (|θBCOV | > |θDCOV|) dosage alterations than between patients. | Gentamicin, CL∼CLC |
4 ωCOV, P >0 | At baseline, assume no IIV in covariate relationship. Benefit from individualization is related to both ηCOV, P and ηP.At later occasions, DCOV determines therapy, however, changes may have a greater risk of over-/under-dosing therefore more frequent monitoring may be needed. | Pefloxacin, CL∼CLCVoriconazole,CL∼log(ALT)CL∼log(DALKP) Paclitaxel PD, Slope∼DBIL |
No significant improvementb | ||
5 θBCOV≈0c | No difference between basing therapy decisions on COV or DCOV, but BCOV is of no value. | Voriconazole, CL∼log(ALKP) |
6 θDCOV≈0c | No difference between basing therapy decisions on COV or BCOV, but DCOV is of no value. | Gentamicin, V1∼BSAPefloxacin, CL∼WT |
7 θBCOV≈θDCOV | No indication that therapeutic decisions based on BCOV and DCOV should be different. | Gentamicin, V1∼ALBVoriconazole, CL∼ALTPaclitaxel PD, MTT∼BIL |
8 ωCOV, P≈0c | Decisions can be based on the assumption that the covariate relationship is the same in all patients. | All examples apart from those in Situation 4 |
Examples from this work, not implying that the models are clinically significant for these drugs.
Based on the difference in OFV from the standard covariate model, P < 0.01.
The confidence interval based on the standard error of the parameter estimate encompasses zero.