Table 2.
Problems identified in medication review reports and recommendations of medication changes based on medication reviews and primary healthcare team discussions
Problems identified in medication review reports | % of problems N = 602 |
---|---|
Condition caused by adverse drug reaction | 16.9% |
Sub-optimal monitoring | 16.3% |
Label discrepancy/other adherence difficulties, e.g. drug not taken as indicated by label or in patient profile (apparent non-concordance), under or overuse reported by patient, administration aid or device not effective | 12.8% |
Disorder treated with wrong (or suboptimal) drug | 9.3% |
Over- or subtherapeutic dosage of correct drug | 9.3% |
Condition caused by drug–drug, drug–food, drug–laboratory test interaction | 9.1% |
Other | 7.8% |
Untreated indication | 6.3% |
Sub-optimal drug administration | 3.8% |
Drug use without valid medical indication | 3.5% |
Poor medication knowledge | 1.7% |
Medication hoarding or poor storage of medication | 2.5% |
Problem associated with drug supply | 0.5% |
No problem stated | 0.2% |
Actions suggested following medication reviews and primary health care team discussions | % of actions suggested N = 747 |
Monitoring – laboratory | 21.0% |
Change drug – substitute one drug for another | 12.6% |
Other, e.g. resolve non-concordance between patient-reported and GP-recorded drug regimen (4.4% of N); further investigation of potential ADE (1.6% of N) | 11.9% |
Provision of patient (or carer) education or information | 10.4% |
Cease drug or trial withdrawal to confirm need for treatment | 9.5% |
Change dose, dosage interval or frequency | 8.7% |
Add a drug | 6.4% |
No recommendation made | 6.4% |
Monitoring observation and non-lab monitoring | 5.0% |
Change administration time, route or dose form | 3.5% |
Rationalize medications held in the home | 1.7% |
Non-drug therapy suggested | 1.5% |
Other intervention to improve adherence | 0.8% |
Refer patient to another professional | 0.5% |
Feedback for 110 patients. Note there are more recommendations than problems, because the reviewing pharmacist sometimes suggested a range of possible interventions.