Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;59(4):387–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02333.x

Table 1.

Comparison of haemodynamic parameters between visits

Visit 1 Visit 2
SBP (mmHg)
″″Baseline 117 ± 3 115 ± 3
″″45 min 120 ± 4* 118 ± 2*
DBP (mmHg)
″″Baseline 69 ± 1 65 ± 2
″″45 min 71 ± 1 69 ± 2*
Heart rate (bpm)
″″Baseline 61 ± 5 62 ± 4
″″45 min 64 ± 6 66 ± 5
FBF (ml min−1dl−1forearm)
″″Non-infused arm
″″Baseline 2.5 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.2
″″45 min 2.8 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.3
″″Infused arm
″″Baseline 2.8 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.7
″″45 min 15.4 ± 1.4 15.2 ± 1.5
FBF-ratio
″″Baseline 1.2 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.2
″″45 min 6.4 ± 1.0 7.1 ± 0.8
″″AUC0–45(ml dl−1forearm) 571 ± 51 556 ± 64
″″ΔFBF0−45 12.6 ± 1.2 12.0 ± 1.5

SBP and DBP, systolic and diastolic blood pressure; FBF, forearm blood flow; FBF-ratio, FBF-ratio between the infused and noninfused arm; AUC0−45, the area under the curve from baseline to 45 min; ΔFBF0−45, increase in FBF from baseline to 45 min. Data are mean ± SEM.

*

P < 0.05 vs. baseline assessed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.