Table 2.
Summary of the univariate analysis for levocetirizine
Effect | ΔOBJF | Symbol | Parameter estimate | s.e. | Ranka |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age on CL/F | −31.227 | θCL | 0.548 | 0.0541 | 3 |
CL/F = θCL + θCL,AGE × AGE | θCL, AGE | 0.0104 | 0.00205 | ||
Age on V/F | −10.352 | θV | 2.23 | 3.34 | 5 |
V/F = θV + θV,AGE × AGE | θV, AGE | 0.228 | 0.140 | ||
Weight on CL/F | −56.200 | θCL | 0.0991 | 0.110 | 1 |
CL/F = θCL + θCL,WT × WT | θCL, WT | 0.0546 | 0.00864 | ||
Weight on V/F | −22.698 | θV | 3 × 10−13 | 0.0781 | |
V/F = θV + ΘV,WT × WT | θV, WT | 0.575 | 0.0598 | ||
Weight on V/F- Linear model (θV = 0) | −22.698 | θV, WT | 0.575 | 0.0615 | 4 |
BSA on CL/F | −57.048 | θCL,BSA | 1.43 | 0.0389 | |
CL/F = θCL,BSA × BSA | θCL, miss | 1.16 | 0.0832 | ||
BSA on V/F | −17.054 | θV,BSA | 13.5 | 1.44 | |
V/F = θV,BSA × BSA | θV, miss | 16.7 | 9.48 | ||
CLcr on CL/F | −39.616 | θCL | 0.478 | 0.0978 | 2 |
CL/F = θCL + θCL,CLcr × CLcr | θCL, CLcr | 0.0126 | 0.00329 | ||
θCL, miss | 0.405 | 0.128 | |||
Gender on CL/F | −1.203 | θCL,M | 0.859 | 0.0292 | |
CL/F = θCL,M (1-SEX) + θCL,F × SEX | −θCL,Φ | 0.818 | 0.0325 | ||
Gender on V/F | −4.330 | θV,M | 9.70 | 1.34 | |
V/F = θV,M (1-SEX) + θV,F × SEX | θV,Φ | 7.62 | 0.806 | ||
Allergen sensitization on CL/F | −4.832 | θCL,NO | 0.821 | 0.0238 | |
CL/F = θCL,NO × (1 − ALLG) + θCL,ALLG × ALLG | θCL,ALLG | 0.923 | 0.0521 | ||
Hydroxyzine on CL/F | −0.002 | θCL,NO | 0.841 | 0.0235 | |
CL/F = θCL,NO × (1-ATAR) + θCL, ATAR × ATAR | θCL,ATAR | 0.845 | 0.106 | ||
Penicillins on CL/F | −0.082 | θCL,NO | 0.840 | 0.0241 | |
CL/F = θCL,NO × (1-PENC) + θCL, PENC × PENC | θCL,PENC | 0.860 | 0.0820 | ||
Corticosteroids on CL/F | −2.965 | θCL,NO | 0.843 | 0.0235 | |
CL/F = θCL,NO × (1-CORT) + θCL, CORT × CORT | θCL,CORT | 0.611 | 0.0896 | ||
Macrolides on CL/F | −2.279 | θCL,NO | 0.843 | 0.0239 | |
CL/F = θCL,NO × (1-MACR) + θCL, MACR × MACR | θCL,MACR | 0.657 | 0.1210 | ||
Diarrhoea/gastroenteritis on CL/F | −0.762 | θCL,NO | 0.844 | 0.0204 | |
CL/F = θCL,NO × (1-DIAR) + θCL, DIAR × DIAR | θCL,DIAR | 0.793 | 0.0562 | ||
Eosinophily on CL/F | −1.145 | θCL, NO | 0.835 | 0.0258 | |
CL/F = θCL,NO × (1-EOS) + θCL,EOS × EOS | θCL, EOS | 0.865 | 0.0344 | ||
θCL, miss | 0.0124 | 0.0708 |
Ranking according to the decrease in objective function (P < 0.005) as compared with the basic model.