Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 2;61(5):558–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02629.x

Table 6.

Population pharmacokinetic model development (two-compartment with nonlinear elimination)

Covariate Model −2LL Δ-2LL P-value
1 Base model 17 137.900
2–1
Vm
CYP2D6 M1 16 977.144 −160.76 <0.005
Wt M2 17 079.98 −57.92 <0.005
Age M3 17 143.06 5.155 >0.05
Race M4 17 133.65 −4.25 <0.05
Sex M5 17 070.42 −67.48 <0.005
2–2
V2
CYP2D6 M6 17 071.83 −66.07 <0.005
Wt M7 17 068.262 −69.64 <0.005
Age M8 17 134.346 −3.55 >0.05
Race M9 17 142.224 4.32 >0.05
Sex M10 17 080.828 −57.07 <0.005
3–1
Vm, V2
Vm(CYP2D6, Wt) M11 16 876.32 −100.82 <0.005
Vm(CYP2D6), V2(Wt) M12 16 900.59 −76.55 <0.005
Vm(CYP2D6), V2(sex) M13 16 892.90 −84.24 <0.005
Vm(CYP2D6, race) M14 16 977.165 0.021 >0.05
3–2
Vm and V2
Vm(CYP2D6), V2(sex, Wt) M15 16 861.53 −31.37 <0.005
Vm(CYP2D6, Wt), V2(sex) M16 16 830.24 −62.66 <0.005

Wt, Weight; V2, volume of distribution of central compartment;Δ-2LL was objective function value (OFV) from covariate model minus base model; −2LL values in 2–1 and 2–2 were compared with base model; −2LL values in 3–1 were compared with model M1; while values in 3–2 were compared with 3–1 M13 and M11. The incorporation of covariates is described in Subjects and methods.