Table 8.
Best-fitting liability threshold model results for the recovered and persistent groups of children (1 threshold model - unaffected /affected).
| Models | Par | -2LL | df | LRT(df) | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECOVERED GROUP | |||||
| Saturated model | 15 | 6502.854 | 12742 | ||
| AE equated across boys and girls | 4 (+ 2 constraints) | 6520.398 | 12755 | 17.54 (13) | -8.46 |
| PERSISTENT GROUP | |||||
| Saturated model | 15 | 1410.555 | 11927 | ||
| AE equated across boys and girls | 4 (+ 2 constraints) | 1426.514 | 11940 | 15.96 (13) | -10.04 |
Note: Models tested were: ACE full sex limitation model allowing both qualitative and quantitative sex difference, ACE common effect sub-model allowing only quantitative sex differences. ACE allowing no qualitative or quantitative sex differences, AE allowing no qualitative or quantitative sex differences and dropping the shared environment parameter. Non-significant p-values indicate that the model tested is a good fit for the data.