Table IV.
Contribution of the K+ Conductance to the BLM Conductance of Proximal Tubule
| Species | g | NPo | f | A | GK | GBLM | GK/GBLM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pS | 10−8cm2 | μS/cm2 | μS/cm2 | |||||||||||
| Necturus | 31.2* | 0.14* | 1.0* ‡ | 1.3* | 33.6* | 33–59§ | 0.57–1.00 | |||||||
| 0.42* | 14.1 | 0.24–0.43 | ||||||||||||
| Rana | 5.6‖ | 0.22‖ | 0.62‖ | 1.57‖ | 48‖ | 33–59§ | 0.81–1.45 | |||||||
| 51.3¶ | 0.94 | |||||||||||||
| Rabbit | 10** | 0.06** | 1.0†† | 1.0** | 100** | 714§§ | 0.14 | |||||||
| Ambystoma | 4‖‖ | 0.20‖‖ | 0.986‖‖ | 1.77‖‖ | 44.6‖‖ | 51.3¶ | 0.87 |
From Kawahara et al., 1987; cell-attached at 0 mV;
assumed in the calculation in Kawahara et al. (1987), despite finding f = 0.42;
from Maunsbach and Boulpaep (1984), for Necturus;
from Hunter (1991), cell attached at 0 mV;
from Maunsbach and Boulpaep (1984), for Ambystoma;
from Parent et al. (1988), cell-attached at −50 mV;
presumed, since data not given in Parent et al. (1988);
from Lapointe et al. (1984);
present study.