Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 17;576(Pt 3):769–785. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117374

Table 3.

Rates of acid gain following ion substitutions or additions of DIDS or EIPA

Rate of gain of acid μm s−1

Paired comparison of 1st and 2nd intervals for a single cover slip 1st interval 2nd interval n P
1 NaCl−Hepes: NaCl−Hepes 7.5 ± 1.8 8.0 ± 1.4 10 0.78
2 NaCl−HCO3: NaCl−HCO3 12.1 ± 1.9 15.0 ± 2.3 9 0.11
3 NaCl−Hepes: NMDGCl−Hepes 7.8 ± 1.1 10.1 ± 1.0 15 < 0.02
4 NaCl−Hepes: NaCl−Hepes + 5 μm EIPA 6.8 ± 1.6 11.0 ± 1.0 10 < 0.01
5 NaCl−HCO3: NMDGCl−HCO3 8.1 ± 1.7 33.5 ± 3.8 27 < 0.001
6 NaCl−HCO3+ 250 μm DIDS: NMDGCl−HCO3+ 250 μm DIDS1 9.1 ± 5.7 4.2 ± 8.3 6 0.25
7 NaCl−HCO3: early Na-gluconate−HCO3 9.7 ± 1.8 −20.0 ± 5.0 14 < 0.001
8 NaCl−HCO3: late Na-gluconate−HCO32 9.7 ± 1.8 9.5 ± 2.02 14 0.75
9 NMDGCl−HCO3: early NMDG-gluconate−HCO3 19.6 ± 2.8 −9.1 ± 1.5  5 < 0.005
10 Na-gluconate−HCO3: NMDG-gluconate−HCO33 12.4 ± 0.8 29.6 ± 3.8 10 < 0.001
1

DIDS was first applied at the start of loading and was then present throughout.

2

The acidwards drift after removal of Cl was preceded by an alkaline shift in pH of 0.16 ± 0.03 units (see row 7 and Fig. 5). The rate reported is the slope seen after the transient.

3

Gluconate replaced Cl during loading with BCECF and throughout the experiment. 4Initial rates of change, i.e. at the onset of the transient alkalinization.