Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 1;102(4):544–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01693.x

Table 5.

Association between education level and hazardous drinking behaviours in the past year, adjusted for other socio-economic factors.

Incomplete secondary or less Secondary, specialised or professional Incomplete/complete higher



OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) P for trend*
Ever consumed surrogates
 Unadjusted 12.8 (5.6, 29.2) 3.9 (1.9, 7.7) < 0.001
 Adj. for employment status 9.6 (4.0, 22.8) 3.4 (1.7, 6.9) 1.0 (referent) < 0.001
 Adj. for amenity index 8.8 (3.8, 20.5) 3.4 (1.7, 6.9) < 0.001
 Adj. for both 7.7 (3.2, 18.5) 3.2 (1.6, 6.5) < 0.001
Had been on zapoi
 Unadjusted 9.4 (4.5, 19.7) 4.0 (2.3, 7.0) < 0.001
 Adj. for employment status 6.0 (2.7, 13.3) 3.3 (1.8, 5.8) 1.0 (referent) < 0.001
 Adj. for amenity index 7.2 (3.4, 15.4) 3.7 (2.1, 6.5) < 0.001
 Adj. for both 5.2 (2.3, 11.8) 3.2 (1.8, 5.7) < 0.001
Had a hangover frequently
 Unadjusted 5.8 (3.0, 11.3) 3.1 (2.0, 5.0) < 0.001
 Adj. for employment status 4.2 (2.1, 8.5) 2.7 (1.7, 4.4) 1.0 (referent) < 0.001
 Adj. for amenity index 4.6 (2.3, 9.1) 2.9 (1.8, 4.6) < 0.001
 Adj. for both 3.7 (1.8, 7.4) 2.6 (1.6, 4.2) < 0.001
Drank spirits daily versus less frequently
 Unadjusted 1.6 (0.6, 4.7) 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) 0.51
 Adj. for employment status 1.3 (0.4, 3.9) 1.0 (0.5, 1.8) 1.0 (referent) 0.82
 Adj. for amenity index 1.4 (0.5, 4.2) 1.0 (0.5, 1.9) 0.71
 Adj. for both 1.3 (0.4, 3.8) 0.9 (0.5, 1.7) 0.91
*

P-value for χ2 test for a general association (non-ordinal variables).

All analyses are adjusted for age group.