Table 7.

Association between amenity index and hazardous drinking behaviours, adjusted for other socio-economic factors.

	Neither car nor central heating		Either car or central heating		Both car and central heating
	OR	(95% CI)	OR	(95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	P for trend*
Ever consumed surrogates
Unadjusted	7.3	(3.9, 13.6)	3.1	(5.1, 2.2)		< 0.001
Adj. for employment status	4.5	(2.3, 8.8)	2.7	(4.4, 2.2)	1.0 (referent)	< 0.001
Adj. for level of education	5.4	(2.9, 10.3)	2.7	(4.4, 2.2)		< 0.001
Adj. for both	3.6	(1.8, 7.1)	2.4	(4.0, 2.2)		< 0.001
Had been on zapoi
Unadjusted	4.2	(2.4, 7.2)	1.8	(2.6, 2.2)		< 0.001
Adj. for employment status	2.4	(1.3, 4.3)	1.5	(2.2, 2.2)	1.0 (referent)	< 0.001
Adj. for level of education	3.2	(1.9, 5.6)	1.6	(2.3, 2.2)		< 0.001
Adj. for both	2.0	(1.1, 3.7)	1.3	(2.0, 2.2)		0.03
Had a hangover frequently
Unadjusted	3.2	(1.9, 5.4)	1.9	(2.6, 2.2)		< 0.001
Adj. for employment status	2.2	(1.3, 3.8)	1.7	(2.3, 2.2)	1.0 (referent)	< 0.001
Adj. for level of education	2.6	(1.5, 4.3)	1.7	(2.3, 2.2)		< 0.001
Adj. for both	1.9	(1.1, 3.2)	1.5	(2.1, 2.2)		0.01
Drank spirits daily versus less frequently
Unadjusted	1.3	(0.4, 3.9)	1.9	(1.1, 3.3)		0.12
Adj. for employment status	0.9	(0.3, 2.7)	1.6	(0.9, 3.0)	1.0 (referent)	0.48
Adj. for level of education	1.2	(0.4, 3.8)	1.8	(1.0, 3.3)		0.15
Adj. for both	0.8	(0.3, 2.6)	1.6	(0.9, 3.0)		0.52

^*P-value for χ² test for a general association (non-ordinal variables).

All analyses are adjusted for age group.