Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb;14(1):34–38. doi: 10.3747/co.2007.113

TABLE I.

Recent studies on radiofrequency ablation for renal tumours

Tumour type
Reference Patients (n) Tumours (n) Mean tumour size or range (cm) Exophytic Parenchymal, central, or mixed Approach Success onct(%) Follow-up (months)
Varkarakis et al., 200530 46 56 2.2 39 17 Perc 84 (47/56) 27
Gervais et al., 200531 85 100 1.1–8.9 67 33 Perc 99 (79/80) 28
Hwang et al., 200432 17 24 2.2 10 14 Lap=15 96 (23/24)
Perc=9
13
Lewin et al., 200433 10 10 2.3 10 0 Perc 100 (10/10) 25
Matsumoto et al., 200434 91 109 2.4 N/A N/A Lap=46 98 (107/109)
Perc=63
19
Ukimura et al., 200435 9 9 3.8 5 3 Perc 78 (7/9) 17
Zagoria et al., 200425 22 24 3.5 9 15 Perc 100 (<3 cm)
69 (>3 cm)
7
Farrell et al., 200336 20 35 1.7 22 13 Perc 100 (35/35) 9
Mayo–Smith et al., 200337 32 32 2.6 29 3 Perc 100 (32/32) 9
Roy–Choudhury et al., 200338 8 11 3.0 9 2 Perc 88 (7/8) 17
Su et al., 200339 29 35 2.2 28 7 Perc 100 (35/35) 9
Ogan et al., 200229 12 13 2.4 10 3 Perc 92 (12/13) 5
Pavlovich et al., 20027 21 24 2.4 13 11 Perc 79 (19/24) 2

ct = computed tomography; Perc = percutaneous; Lap = laparoscopic.