Skip to main content
letter
. 2007 Jun;17(6):839–851. doi: 10.1101/gr.5586307

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Comparison of results from five methods of pseudogene identification. (A) Pseudogenes annotated by a method were binned into groups based on the number of methods that recognized them as pseudogenes. In this scheme, method-specific pseudogenes were labeled as (found by) “1” method. (B) A four-way comparison of pseudogenes identified by HAVANA, PseudoPipe, retroFinder, and pseudoFinder. Note: one pseudogene could overlap more than one pseudogene from other method(s).