Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar 19;51(6):2240–2243. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01440-06

TABLE 2.

Effects of selected anti-HBV drugs on replication of wt HBV and HBV laboratory strains of genotype D carrying lamivudine, adefovir, or lamivudine-adefovir resistance mutationsa

HBV strainb LAMc
ADVc
TDFc
ETVc
PMEO-DAPym
EC50 (μM) FRd EC50 (μM) FR EC50 (μM) FR EC50 (μM) FR EC50e (μM) FR
wt 2.48 ± 0.67 1 15.8 ± 1.9 1 10.3 ± 1.3 1 0.8 ± 0.1 1 4.0 ± 0.51 1
ADVr 2.65 ± 0.52 1.06 50.3 ± 11 3.2 46 ± 6 4.5 0.7 0.88 4.5 ± 0.35 1.1
LAMr >100 >40 15.5 ± 1.8 0.98 35.2 ± 5.1 3.4 5 ± 0.25 6.25 4.7 ± 1.12 1.2
LAMr +ADVr >100 >40 100 ± 20 6.3 45.5 ± 6.1 4.4 5 ± 0.7 6.25 5.7 ± 0.77 1.4
a

LAM, lamivudine; ADV, adefovir; TDF, tenofovir; ETV, entecavir.

b

Lamivudine-resistant (LAMr) mutant rtL180M/M204V, adefovir-resistant (ADVr) mutant rtN236T, and lamivudine-adefovir-resistant mutant (LAMr +ADVr) rtL180M/M204V/N236T.

c

Data were reported previously (3).

d

FR, fold resistance, which is equal to (mutant EC50)/(wt EC50).

e

The values represent the means of at least three independent experiments, each of which was performed in triplicate. For each experiment, the drug-resistant HBV strains and their corresponding wt strain were treated simultaneously with the same range of drug concentrations (from 0 to 100 μM for PMEO-DAPym, lamivudine, adefovir, and tenofovir; from 0 to 10 μM for entecavir), and all the samples were extracted and analyzed by Southern blotting in parallel.