Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Endocrinology. 2007 Jan 18;148(4):1590–1597. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-1170

Table 2.

Effects of every day (ED) or every third day (ETD) administration of vehicle solution, GH or PEG-T3C for 9 d on body weight gain and tibial epiphyses width in HYPOX rats

Compound Dose and Frequency a Cumulative Body Weight Gain (g)b Tibial Epiphyses Width (μm)b
Vehicle ED 0.8 ± 0.7 223 ± 15.1
GH 30 μ g ED 21.3 ± 1.4c 408.4 ± 14.2c
GH 10 μ g ED 16.2 ± 1.2 c,g 399.6 ± 15.6 c
PEG-T3C 10 μ g ED 18.6 ± 2.2 c 384.4 ± 13.0 c
Vehicle ETD 1.5 ± 1.4 231.6 ± 17.4
GH 30 μ g ETD 6.8 ± 1.4 d, g, h, i 315.2 ± 15.6 d, g, h, i
GH 10 μ g ETD 8.0 ± 1.6 d, g, h, ,i 284.0 ± 6.9 d, g, h, i
PEG-T3C 30 μ gETD 17.5 ± 1.2 d, e, f 428.4 ± 18.3 d, e, f
PEG-T3C 10 μ g ETD 12.3 ± 0.8 d, e, f, g, h 329.2 ± 15.6 d, f, h
PEG-T3C 2 μ g ETD 8.0 ± 1.4 d, g, h, i 263.2 ± 7.1 e, g, h, i
a

ED rats were dosed on d 1-9. ETD rats were dosed on d 1, 4 and 7. Rats were sacrificed on d 10. The PEG-T3C doses exclude the contribution of PEG to the mass of PEG-T3C.

b

means ± SE for 5 rats/group. Body weights were measured over 10 d.

c

p < 0.05 vs ED vehicle

d

p < 0.05 vs ETD vehicle

e

p < 0.05 vs ETD GH 30μg

f

p < 0.05 vs ETD GH 10μg

g

p < 0.05 vs ED GH 30μg

h

p < 0.05 vs ED GH 10μg

i

p < 0.05 vs ED PEG-T3C