Table 2.
Compound | Dose and Frequency a | Cumulative Body Weight Gain (g)b | Tibial Epiphyses Width (μm)b |
---|---|---|---|
Vehicle | ED | 0.8 ± 0.7 | 223 ± 15.1 |
GH | 30 μ g ED | 21.3 ± 1.4c | 408.4 ± 14.2c |
GH | 10 μ g ED | 16.2 ± 1.2 c,g | 399.6 ± 15.6 c |
PEG-T3C | 10 μ g ED | 18.6 ± 2.2 c | 384.4 ± 13.0 c |
Vehicle | ETD | 1.5 ± 1.4 | 231.6 ± 17.4 |
GH | 30 μ g ETD | 6.8 ± 1.4 d, g, h, i | 315.2 ± 15.6 d, g, h, i |
GH | 10 μ g ETD | 8.0 ± 1.6 d, g, h, ,i | 284.0 ± 6.9 d, g, h, i |
PEG-T3C | 30 μ gETD | 17.5 ± 1.2 d, e, f | 428.4 ± 18.3 d, e, f |
PEG-T3C | 10 μ g ETD | 12.3 ± 0.8 d, e, f, g, h | 329.2 ± 15.6 d, f, h |
PEG-T3C | 2 μ g ETD | 8.0 ± 1.4 d, g, h, i | 263.2 ± 7.1 e, g, h, i |
ED rats were dosed on d 1-9. ETD rats were dosed on d 1, 4 and 7. Rats were sacrificed on d 10. The PEG-T3C doses exclude the contribution of PEG to the mass of PEG-T3C.
means ± SE for 5 rats/group. Body weights were measured over 10 d.
p < 0.05 vs ED vehicle
p < 0.05 vs ETD vehicle
p < 0.05 vs ETD GH 30μg
p < 0.05 vs ETD GH 10μg
p < 0.05 vs ED GH 30μg
p < 0.05 vs ED GH 10μg
p < 0.05 vs ED PEG-T3C