Skip to main content
. 2003 Nov;163(5):1765–1770. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63536-5

Table 2.

Aberrations that Showed the Most Differences in Frequencies in Comparisons Between Groups

Position Aberration type Groups compared P value Significance
12q14 Gain AM; 5 (22.7%) Non-AM; 0 (0%) 0.000092 Y
5pter Gain AM; 8 (36.4%) Non-AM; 5 (4.6%) 0.00015 Y
17pter Loss LMM; 9 (36%) SSM; 2 (3.8%) 0.00043 N
15q13 Loss AM; 5 (22.7%) Non-AM; 1 (0.9%) 0.00049 N
15q21.1 Gain LMM; 5 (20%) SSM; 0 (0%) 0.0027 N
11q13.3 Gain AM; 5 (22.7%) Non-AM; 10 (9.3%) 0.0028 N
10q22.2 Loss no-CSD; 31 (40.8%) CSD; 4 (12.5%) 0.0037 N
13q21.1 Loss LMM; 8 (32%) SSM; 3 (5.8%) 0.004 N
16q24 Loss AM; 8 (36.4%) Non-AM; 11 (10.2%) 0.0044 N
17pter Loss CSD; 9 (28.1%) no-CSD; 5 (6.6%) 0.0044 N
10pter Loss no-CSD; 28 (36.8%) CSD; 3 (9.4) 0.0046 N
6q23.1 Loss AM; 11 (50%) Non-AM; 21 (19.4%) 0.0052 N
17qter Gain LMM; 10 (40%) SSM; 6 (11.5%) 0.0066 N
15q15 Gain CSD; 4 (12.5%) no-CSD; 0 (0%) 0.0067 N
4q11 Gain AM; 4 (18.2%) Non-AM; 1 (0.9%) 0.0076 N

The first column shows the chromosome band, followed by the type of aberration. The third and fourth columns the group with the higher or lower frequency of aberrations, respectively, followed by the number of cases with the aberration in this group and the percentage in parentheses. The last column indicates whether the P value in the second last column is significant (Y) after correction for multiple comparisons or not (N).