Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2006 Nov 22;144(3):797–807. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.10.017

Table 2.

Data table for immunoblot analyses of PKC βII and β-actin levels and measures of freezing behavior to cue and context probe trials. Training conditions are shown as columns, measurements (mean ± SEM) are shown as rows. Significant differences between hemispheres or between training conditions are indicated in text and figures.

TRAINING CONDITIONS
BOX ALONE PAIRED TONE/SHOCK UNPAIRED TONE/SHOCK ALTERNATING TONE/SHOCK
BIOCHEMISTRY N 14 19 10 17
MEAN LEVEL OF PKC βII RIGHT 1720 ± 194 1545 ± 161 2303 ± 200 2142 ± 117
MEAN LEVEL OF PKC βII LEFT 2258 ± 154 2062 ± 126 1992 ± 256 2129 ± 100
DIFFERENCE IN MEAN LEVEL OF PKC βII − 0.17 ± 0.07 − 0.16 ± 0.05 +0.09 ± 0.06 − 0.01 ± 0.05
MEAN LEVEL OF β-ACTIN RIGHT 4455 ± 398 4317 ± 335 4145 ± 491 4414 ± 428
MEAN LEVEL OF β-ACTIN LEFT 4698 ± 613 4336 ± 272 4175 ± 491 4026 ± 418
DIFFERENCE IN MEAN LEVEL OF β-ACTIN −0.052 ± 0.15 −0.029 ± 0.06 −0.029 ± 0.08 0.1931 ± 0.074
BEHAVIOR N 4 6 6 6
FRACTIONAL FREEZING TIME TO CONTEXT 0.084 ± 0.043 0.199 ± 0.043 0.713 ± 0.079 0.552 ± 0.081
FRACTIONAL FREEZING TIME TO CUE 0.271 ± 0.095 0.822 ± 0.036 0.887 ± 0.025 0.534 ± 0.161