Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar 2;73(9):2897–2904. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02388-06

TABLE 2.

Summary of results obtained from four independent biofilms grown without calcium addition

Sample Scan no. Vol displaced after 4 raster abrasions (μm3) Friction forcea (nN) Frictional energy dissipatedb (pJ) Cohesive energyc (pJ/μm3)
Biofilm 1 4 1.090 3.49 16.89 15.5
8 0.156 2.37 22.32 143.1
12 0.137 2.31 32.53 235.7
16 0.893 4.85 95.42 106.7
20 0.106 5.25 129.63 1,222.9
Biofilm 2 4 0.663 5.33 26.31 39.7
8 0.250 3.54 34.32 137.3
12 0.075 1.35 17.86 238.1
16 0.838 3.45 66.85 79.8
20 0.062 6.44 160.02 2,560.3
Biofilm 3 4 0.981 6.36 31.61 32.2
8 0.480 4.24 41.55 86.4
12 0.325 1.69 23.08 71.1
16 0.506 1.73 31.70 62.6
20 0.044 3.08 74.16 1,693.1
Biofilm 4 4 0.544 3.57 17.31 31.8
8 0.631 3.05 29.29 46.4
12 0.363 3.86 56.40 155.4
16 0.688 4.39 86.09 125.1
20 0.062 6.85 170.48 2,727.7
a

The slope Inline graphic was 0.0012 ± 0.0002 V/nN.

b

Frictional energy dissipated = WTWh. The length of each scan line was 2.5 μm, and the number of scan lines per raster was 256.

c

Cohesive energy (εcoh) = (WTWh)/V.