TABLE 3.
Comparison of Full-Field Digital and Screen-Film Mammographic Techniques in Detecting Phantom Breast Masses of Various Shapes
Mass Shape | Imaging System | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | AUC | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Round | FFDM | 0.925 | 0.822 | 0.721 | 0.989 | 0.834 | 0.776 | 0.030 |
SFM | 0.940 | 0.687 | 0.564 | 0.990 | 0.717 | 0.629 | ||
Irregular | FFDM | 0.811 | 0.829 | 0.697 | 0.971 | 0.828 | 0.596 | < 0.001 |
SFM | 0.811 | 0.695 | 0.526 | 0.964 | 0.712 | 0.490 |
Note—For calculation of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy, confidence level scores of 3, 4, and 5 were considered positive for each imaging system, and confidence level scores of 1 and 2 were considered negative for each imaging system. All p values were calculated based on the difference in AUC between the two mammographic systems using a paired-sample Student’s t test. PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, FFDM = full-field digital mammography, SFM = screen-film mammography.