Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):W576–W581. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0126

TABLE 3.

Comparison of Full-Field Digital and Screen-Film Mammographic Techniques in Detecting Phantom Breast Masses of Various Shapes

Mass Shape Imaging System Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy AUC p

Round FFDM 0.925 0.822 0.721 0.989 0.834 0.776 0.030
SFM 0.940 0.687 0.564 0.990 0.717 0.629
Irregular FFDM 0.811 0.829 0.697 0.971 0.828 0.596 < 0.001
SFM 0.811 0.695 0.526 0.964 0.712 0.490

Note—For calculation of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy, confidence level scores of 3, 4, and 5 were considered positive for each imaging system, and confidence level scores of 1 and 2 were considered negative for each imaging system. All p values were calculated based on the difference in AUC between the two mammographic systems using a paired-sample Student’s t test. PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, FFDM = full-field digital mammography, SFM = screen-film mammography.