TABLE 4.
Comparison of Full-Field Digital and Screen-Film Mammographic Techniques in Detecting Phantom Breast Masses of Various Densities
Mass Density | Imaging System | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | AUC | p- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | FFDM | 0.741 | 0.822 | 0.661 | 0.961 | 0.814 | 0.484 | 0.085 |
SFM | 0.748 | 0.685 | 0.498 | 0.954 | 0.696 | 0.414 | ||
High | FFDM | 0.988 | 0.829 | 0.751 | 0.998 | 0.847 | 0.714 | < 0.001 |
SFM | 0.995 | 0.697 | 0.587 | 0.998 | 0.731 | 0.621 |
Note—For calculation of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy, confidence level scores of 3, 4, and 5 were considered positive for each imaging system, and confidence level scores of 1 and 2 were considered negative for each imaging system. All p values were calculated based on the difference in AUC between the two mammographic systems using a paired-sample Student’s t test. PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, FFDM = full-field digital mammography, SFM = screen-film mammography.