Skip to main content
. 2007 May;176(1):563–570. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.067033

TABLE 2.

Power to detect three-way interactions (1 − β*) and proportion of false positives (PFP) using the four-step genome scan for different mating designs to establish recombinant inbred lines (RIL): nested (NAM), diallel (DAM), single round robin (SRR), and distance-based (DB) designs

4 QTL
12 QTL
Mating design No. RIL Criterion h2 = 0.5 h2 = 0.8 h2 = 0.5 h2 = 0.8
NAM 5000 1 − β* 0.28 0.33 0.18 0.29
PFP 0.54 0.64 0.29 0.41
DAM4875 4875 1 − β* 0.44 0.54 0.30 0.54
PFP 0.44 0.46 0.16 0.30
SRR 4888 1 − β* 0.29 0.38 0.24 0.34
PFP 0.56 0.51 0.26 0.47
DB75 × 65 4875 1 − β* 0.38 0.41 0.29 0.49
PFP 0.47 0.63 0.19 0.37
DB125 × 39 4875 1 − β* 0.45 0.56 0.31 0.54
PFP 0.39 0.56 0.19 0.35
DB195 × 25 4875 1 − β* 0.45 0.58 0.32 0.57
PFP 0.45 0.64 0.17 0.34
NAM and DAM900 5900 1 − β* 0.40 0.60
PFP 0.47 0.51
NAM and DB25 × 36 5900 1 − β* 0.27 0.33
PFP 0.52 0.64
NAM and DB50 × 18 5900 1 − β* 0.38 0.53
PFP 0.46 0.58
NAM and DB100 × 9 5900 1 − β* 0.42 0.60
PFP 0.46 0.51
NAM and DB150 × 6 5900 1 − β* 0.39 0.57
PFP 0.46 0.59