TABLE 2.

Comparison of clade support values

Clade/subfamilya	Becker and Theissen (2003)	Parsimony, ClustalX	Parsimony, DIALIGN-T	Neighbor-joining, ClustalX	Neighbor-joining, DIALIGN-T	Bayesian, ClustalXb	Bayesian, DIALIGN-T
flc	100	61	44	71	52	100	88
squa (A class)	100	32	27	30	38	50	100
def (B class)	99	87	82	82	74	100	98
glo (B class)	54	46	32	61	38	79	36
ag (C class)	100	92	96	99	100	99	100
agl2 (E class)	94	31	74	94	80	73	98
mean (A, B, C, E)	89.4	57.6	62.2	73.2	66.0	80.2	86.3
sd (A, B, C, E)	19.9	29.8	30.9	28.2	27.4	20.7	28.4
pc	0.594	0.909	0.556	0.938	0.609	0.339	0.952

^aSubfamily names are based on Becker and Theissen (2003).

^bBayesian posterior probabilities multiplied by 100 for uniformity.

^cBased on a one-sample z-test to determine whether the support value for the FLC-like clade was significantly different from the mean of the A-, B-, C-, and E-class clades, which are accepted as monophyletic.