TABLE 2.
Hybrid progeny from Df(1)Hmr−/FM6; Nup96−/TM3 D. melanogaster females and D. simulans, D. sechellia, or D. mauritiana males
Df(1)Hmr−/+ females
|
FM6/+ females
|
Df(1)Hmr− malesa
|
Xsib males
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male parent | No. of TM3/+ | No. of Nup−/+ | Relative viability | No. of TM3/+ | No. of Nup−/+ | Relative viability | No. of TM3/+ | No. of Nup−/+ | Relative viability | No. of TM3/+ | No. of Nup−/+ | Relative viability |
1. D. simulans v | 95 | 166 | 1.75 | 51 | 32 | 0.63 | 111 | 0 | 0.00*** | 18 | 29 | 1.61 |
2. D. simulans MD199S | 294 | 290 | 0.99 | 116 | 146 | 1.26 | 153 | 0 | 0.00*** | 50 | 41 | 0.82 |
3. D. sechellia Sy007 | 63 | 89 | 1.41 | 1 | 17 | 17.00 | 39 | 0 | 0.00*** | 10 | 11 | 1.10 |
4. D. sechellia Robertson | 83 | 103 | 1.24 | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 46 | 1 | 0.02*** | 4 | 13 | 3.25 |
5. D. sechellia Praslin Island | 107 | 92 | 0.86 | 1 | 6 | 6.00 | 71 | 0 | 0.00*** | 18 | 16 | 0.89 |
6. D. sechellia Iso 81 | 80 | 79 | 0.99 | 0 | 13 | — | 22 | 0 | 0.00*** | 14 | 13 | 0.93 |
7. D. mauritiana w f | 37 | 41 | 1.11 | 22 | 29 | 1.32 | 8 | 15 | 1.88 (NS) | 4 | 8 | 2.00 |
8. D. mauritiana Iso 75 | 160 | 111 | 0.69 | 130 | 124 | 0.95 | 122 | 114 | 0.93 (NS) | 18 | 21 | 1.17 |
9. D. mauritiana Iso 105 | 72 | 68 | 0.94 | 46 | 60 | 1.30 | 64 | 54 | 0.84 (NS) | 12 | 12 | 1.00 |
10. D. mauritiana Iso 152 | 78 | 84 | 1.08 | 42 | 84 | 2.00 | 52 | 56 | 1.08 (NS) | 16 | 20 | 1.25 |
11. D. mauritiana W138 | 69 | 94 | 1.36 | 56 | 79 | 1.41 | 65 | 64 | 0.98 (NS) | 9 | 14 | 1.56 |
12. D. mauritiana W139 | 121 | 143 | 1.18 | 106 | 152 | 1.43 | 115 | 128 | 1.11 (NS) | 31 | 29 | 0.94 |
13. D. mauritiana W140 | 169 | 153 | 0.91 | 116 | 125 | 1.08 | 131 | 131 | 1.00 (NS) | 6 | 26 | 4.33 |
14. D. mauritiana W146 | 58 | 77 | 1.33 | 36 | 64 | 1.78 | 58 | 32 | 0.55* | 8 | 9 | 1.13 |
Df(1)Hmr−, y w v/FM6; Nup96−/TM3 D. melanogaster females were crossed to males indicated in the first column. Progeny of crosses are as diagrammed in Figure 1. Some crosses produced B Hw males, as described originally by Hutter (1990) and proposed to be of mosaic origin. Among live progeny only, crosses produced the following: cross 1, 20+, and 1 Sb; cross 2, 3+, and 1 Sb; cross 3, 7+, and 0 Sb; cross 4, 3+, and 0 Sb; cross 5, 4+, and 0 Sb; cross 6, none; cross 7, none; cross 8, 4+, and 0 Sb; cross 9, 6+, and 0 Sb; cross 10, 2+, and 0 Sb; cross 11, 1+, and 0 Sb; cross 12, none; cross 13, 8+, and 0 Sb; cross 14, 2+, and 0 Sb. NS, not significant. *P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001.
The significance of differences in the two classes of Df(1)Hmr− males compared to Df(1)Hmr−/+ females was tested using Fisher's exact test (one tailed).