Skip to main content
. 2003 Feb;55(2):191–198. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01725.x

Table 3.

Effect of probenecid on the different metabolic caffeine ratios commonly used for NAT2 phenotyping (a, b), and as indices of CYP1A2 (c), and XO (d) in 10 healthy fast and 10 slow acetylators

AFMU/1MX(a) P-value AFMU/(AFMU +1MX + 1MU) (b) P-value (AFMU + 1MX +1MU)/17MU (c) P-value 1 MU/1MX(d) P-value
All volunteers (n = 30)
 Baseline value 0.97 ± 0.21 0.24 ± 0.04 4.82 ± 0.33 1.34 ± 0.09
 During probenecid 1.53 ± 0.35 < 0.002 0.26 ± 0.04 0.054 3.83 ± 0.37 0.25 2.24 ± 0.14 < 0.0001
 95% CI 0.237, 0.876 −0.0012, 0.0303 −0.801, 0.309 0.74, 1.06
Fast acetylators (n = 15)
 Baseline value 1.74 ± 0.21 0.40 ± 0.02 3.88 ± 1.33 1.52 ± 0.44
 During probenecid 2.73 ± 0.42 < 0.004 0.42 ± 0.03 0.33 3.95 ± 1.58 0.77 2.52 ± 0.60 < 0.002
 95% CI 0.47, 1.51 −0.014, 0.046 −0.644, 0.775 0.75, 1.26
Slow acetylators (n = 15)
 Baseline value 0.21 ± 0.18 0.09 ± 0.08 4.28 ± 1.68 1.17 ± 0.31
 During probenecid 0.33 ± 0.04 < 0.004 0.10 ± 0.01 < 0.05 3.70 ± 1.83 0.19 1.96 ± 0.48 < 0.002
 95% CI 0.063, 0.189 0.0007, 0.0250 −1.40, 0.29 0.604, 0.189

Data are given as mean ±>s.e.m. with 95% CI on differences. AFMU, Acetyl-amino-6-formylamino-3-methyluracil; 1MX, 1-methylxanthine; 1MU, 1-methyuric acid.