Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Jun;49(3):572–587. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/041)

Table 3.

Mean proportions (SDs) of paradigmatic and syntagmatic word association responses of bilingual and monolingual children during the first, second, and third elicitations.

Bilingual children
Monolingual children
Mandarin
English
English
Response type Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
Paradigmatic .43 (.24) .31 (.22) .18 (.19) .50 (.18) .33 (.12) .23 (.08) .40 (.23) .32 (.18) .25 (.17)
Syntagmatic .44 (.23) .50 (.18) .55 (.18) .44 (.19) .54 (.16) .60 (.11) .45 (.22) .50 (.21) .46 (.20)

Note. Pairwise comparisons for paradigmatic performance indicated that Trial 1 > Trial 2 > Trial 3 for bilingual Mandarin and bilingual English performance; Trial 1 > Trial 2 = Trial 3 for monolinguals. No other pairwise comparisons reached significance.