Skip to main content
. 2007 May 30;8:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-137

Table 3.

Conservation of gene order in streptophyte mitochondrial genomes

Compared genomes No. of conserved gene clusters a No. of genes in clusters/no. of shared genes b Similarity index c No. of reversals d
Chara/Physcomitrella 10 59/64 9.2 12
Chaetosphaeridium/Physcomitrella 10 40/62 6.5 26
Marchantia/Physcomitrella 14 59/65 6.5 14
Chaetosphaeridium/Chara 12 43/65 5.5 28
Chara/Marchantia 16 58/67 5.4 20
Chaetosphaeridium/Marchantia 15 46/65 4.7 27
Chlorokybus/Physcomitrella 8 20/61 4.1 47
Chlorokybus/Chaetosphaeridium 9 22/65 3.8 49
Chlorokybus/Chara 9 21/65 3.6 51
Mesostigma/Physcomitrella 2 4/61 3.3 57
Chlorokybus/Marchantia 10 21/66 3.2 51
Mesostigma/Chaetosphaeridium 2 4/65 3.1 60
Mesostigma/Chara 2 4/65 3.1 61
Mesostigma/Marchantia 2 4/65 3.1 60
Chlorokybus/Mesostigma 2 4/66 3.0 63

a A conserved gene cluster is defined here as a suite of genes/gene pieces with the same order and polarities in the pair of compared genomes.

b The ratio of these two values represents the fraction of shared genes/gene pieces found in conserved clusters.

c This value was obtained by dividing the percentage of shared genes/gene pieces found in conserved clusters by the number of conserved clusters.

d GRIMM was used to infer the numbers of reversals required to transform gene order in the compared genomes.