Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 28;106(10):3358–3365. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1535

Table 5.

Risk of breast cancer among women diagnosed with HL at age 30 years or younger who had a live birth, according to timing of live births

Patients, no (%) Matched control subjects, no. (%) Odds ratio, adjusted*(95% CI)
Among women who did not receive AA or RT to ovaries ≥ 5 Gy, and also had ≥ 1 live birth: patients (n = 50) and matched control subjects (n = 96)
    Most recent live birth preceding HL
        Live birth 16 mos. or more 13 (54.2) 16 (43.2) 1.0
        Live birth 16 mos. or less 10 (41.7) 16 (43.2) 1.2 (0.40-3.4)
        Unknown 1 (4.1) 5 (13.6)
Among women who did not receive AA and who received < 5 Gy RT to ovaries, and also had ≥ 1 live birth: patients (n = 50) and matched control subjects (n = 96)
    Most recent live birth following HL
        Live birth later than 60 mos. 10 (27.0) 33 (44.6) 1.0
        Live birth at 60 mos. or earlier 25 (67.6) 33 (44.6) 2.6 (1.0-6.7)
        Unknown 2 (5.4) 8 (10.8)
Among women who did not receive AA and who received < 5 Gy RT to ovaries, and had ≥ 1 live birth: Patients (n = 50) and matched control subjects (n = 96)
    Time elapsed btw, most recent live birth and BC diagnosis/control cutoff date, y
        20 or more 11 (22.0) 20 (20.8) 1.0
        15-19 16 (32.0) 23 (24.0) 1.0 (0.3-3.6)
        10-14 8 (16.0) 18 (18.8) 0.5 (0.1-2.8)
        5-9 8 (16.0) 10 (10.4) 0.9 (0.2-4.4)
        5 or less 6 (12.0) 13 (13.5) 0.6 (0.1-7.4)
        Unknown parity or timing of most recent birth 1 (2.0) 12 (12.5)

—indicates not calculated; BC, breast cancer.

*

Analyses were adjusted for age at first live birth (≤ 22y, 23-26y, and ≥ 27y).

Columns do not add to 50 patients and 96 control subjects because some women had a live birth both before and after HL, and are counted in both analyses, while others are counted only once.