Skip to main content
. 2007 May 17;7:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-82

Table 3.

Comparison among economic parameters of two strategies for control of severe asthma (n = 64)

year before ProAR (US Dollars) year after ProAR (US Dollars)
median (quartile) median (quartile) p*
Government annual costs of treatment per patient
 Cost of outpatient treatment 184 (177/192) 359 (240/471) < 0.01
 Cost of hospital treatment 590 (78/1330) 0 (0/19) < 0.01
 Total annual government costs of treatment 750 (286/1462) 363 (255/481) < 0.01
Family annual costs of treatment and income
 Family income 2768 (1912/4033) 3280 (2191/5050) 0.02
 Family expenses with asthma (direct cost) 615 (343/1374) 74 (34/275) < 0.01
 Proportion of income spent with asthma 29% 2%
 Losses for patient and companion (indirect cost) 0 (0/134) 0 (0/0) < 0.01
 Total family costs (direct + indirect) 807 (358/1509) 74 (35/281) < 0.01

* Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests