Isolation of CXCR4+ and CXCR4−
subfractions within primitive human hematopoietic populations.
(A) A representative FACS analysis of human neuronal
(i), muscle (ii), and CB cells
(Lin−) (iii), stained with either 12 g5 or
44717.111 anti-human CXCR4 antibodies conjugated to PE. The percentage
of CXCR4+ cells detected is given above each positive gate
as the mean ± SEM of four (neural), two (muscle), and six
(hematopoietic) different samples. CB Lin− cells stained
with mouse IgG1 served as isotype to establish sorting gates for the
purification of CXCR4− and CXCR4+
hematopoietic subpopulations indicated as R1 and R2, respectively
(iii). Subpopulations of CD34+
CD38−Lin− cells were isolated by using the R3
sorting gate (iv). (B) CD34+
CD38−Lin− cells stained with IgG1-PE were
analyzed by FACS and confocal to serve as a control (i).
Fluorescence of control (i) was compared with purified
CD34+
CD38−Lin−CXCR4− (R1 and R3) and
CD34+ CD38−Lin−CXCR4+
(R2 and R3) cells, a measure of sort purity (ii and
iii). Selected CXCR4− cells were restained
for CXCR4 by using 12 g5 or 44717.111 and reanalyzed to verify the
absence of any CXCR4+ cells (iv). For
confocal microscopy, primitive CD34+
CD38−Lin− cells stained with isotype control,
CD34+
CD38−Lin−CXCR4−, and
CD34+ CD38−Lin−CXCR4+
cells were isolated by FACS and visualized with a Zeiss LSM-410
confocal microscope at random z-planes. Representative photographs
depicting the PE and FITC fluorescence from CD34+
CD38−Lin− isotype control (i),
CD34+
CD38−Lin−CXCR4−
(ii), and CD34+
CD38−Lin−CXCR4+
(iii) cells are presented along side each corresponding
population reanalyzed by FACS (n = 4).