Table 1.
A, mV−1 | n, 20°C | V0, mV | Gjmax | Gjmin | Pomin | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT/WT (Vj = 0)* | 0.043 | 1.09 | −54 | 1.03 | 0.78 | 0.61 |
WT/WT (Vj = 80)* | 0.031 | 0.79 | −38 | 1.01 | 0.92 | 0.85 |
S257stop/S257stop (Vj = 0)* | 0.041 | 1.06 | −59 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 0.62 |
S257stop/S257stop (Vj = 80)* | 0.037 | 0.94 | −62 | 1.05 | 0.77 | 0.59 |
G242stop/G242stop | NE | NE | NE | NE | NE | NE |
G242stop/WT† | 0.046 | 1.16 | −60 | 1.02 | 0.81 | — |
R243Q + D245Q/R243Q + D245Q* | NE | NE | NE | NE | NE | NE |
R243Q/R243Q* | 0.027 | 0.69 | +11 | 1.04 | 0.91 | 0.83 |
D245Q/D245Q* | 0.059 | 1.48 | −64 | 1.04 | 0.41 | 0.64 |
Gjss/Vm relations of homotypic junctions were described by the square of a Boltzmann relation, based on a model of two independent Vm gates in series, one in each hemichannel, where each gate could be either open or completely closed.
The Gjss/Vm relation of the heterotypic G242stop-WT junctions was fit by a single Boltzmann relation, assuming that only the gate of the WT hemichannels was contributing to the Vm sensitivity; the calculated parameters were close to those of the WT gate obtained by fitting a squared Boltzmann. NE, not estimated; the changes in Gjss were too small to allow accurate determination of the parameters. However, the smooth curves for these junctions in Figs. 1–3 were obtained by the same fitting procedures as for the more sensitive junctions.