Skip to main content
. 2007 Jun 8;8:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-155

Table 3.

Estimation of QTL for meat quality traits in a novel F2 chicken population

QTLMAP QTLExpress

Trait1 GGA Location2 Flanking markers LRP3 Var4 (%) P-Value (Chr)5 P_Value (Chr)5 F values Location (cM)
BCo-Y 1 174 (168–182) ADL188 – ADL150 102 20.5 0.02*6 ns 5.13 49
DL 1 357 (352–367) MCW200 – LEI139 114 12 0.002**7 0.02* 10.1 560(454–565)
pH15 1 396 (386–403) LEI139 – MCW283 126 29 <0.0005** 0.04* 8.97 369(324–404)
pH15 2 249 (243–274) MCW063 – ADL257 124 14 <0.0005** ns 2.36 302
pHu 4 189 (140–200) ADL331 – MCW240 99 18 0.02* <0.0005** 21.71 191(182–231)
BCo-Y 11 62 (56–69) ADL210 – ADL308 153 31 <0.0005** <0.0005** 53.42 62(51–69)
BCo-R 11 68 (58–69) ADL210 – ADL308 115 19 <0.0005** <0.0005** 24.83 65(41–69)
pH15 12 24 (16–30) ADL372 – ADL044 105 21 0.005* ns 4.43 0
DL 14 20 (20–44) ADL118 – MCW123 98 13.5 0.003* ns 0.49 45

1BCo-Y = yellowness; DL = drip loss, pH15 = pH 15 minutes post-mortem; pHu = ultimate pH; BCo-R = redness; 2Location and confidence interval in cM; 3Likelihood ratio 4Variance explained by the QTL (%) 5Chromosome-wide P-Value; 6* = Suggestive; 7** = Genome-wide 1%