Skip to main content
. 2000 Dec 19;97(26):14825–14830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14825

Table 1.

Heritability estimates (h2) for choice of breeding-colony size in cliff swallows

Category of birds h2 SEM P
Midparent, using offspring's natal-colony size as parental value
 Male (n = 1,390)* 0.346 0.027 <0.0001
 Female (n = 1,078) 0.377 0.032 <0.0001
 Birds always using natal site (n = 1,654) 0.369 0.020 <0.0001
 Birds using only nonnatal sites (n = 927) 0.326 0.036 <0.0001
Midparent, using parents' all known breeding-colony sizes
 Male (n = 92) 0.279 0.235 0.24
 Female (n = 58) 0.553 0.216 0.013
Single-parent, using parents' all known breeding-colony sizes
 Male–father (n = 92) 0.714 0.472 0.13
 Male–mother (n = 58) 0.312 0.407 0.44
 Female–father (n = 92) 1.131 0.349 0.002
 Female–mother (n = 58) 0.642 0.474 0.018
Midparent, 1997 cross-fostering, using offspring's natal-colony size as parental value
 Males, not cross fostered, against birth colony (n = 143) 0.470 0.107 <0.0001
 Males, cross fostered, against birth colony (n = 130) 0.536 0.102 <0.0001
 Males, cross fostered, against rearing colony (n = 130) −0.549 0.103 <0.0001
 Females, not cross fostered, against birth colony (n = 114) 0.345 0.116 0.003
 Females, cross fostered, against birth colony (n = 116) 0.295 0.122 0.017
 Females, cross fostered, against rearing colony (n = 116) −0.306 0.124 0.015
Midparent, 1998 cross-fostering, using offspring's natal-colony size as parental value (sexes combined)
 Not cross fostered, against birth colony (n = 87) 0.375 0.061 <0.0001
 Cross fostered, against birth colony (n = 88) 0.179 0.072 0.015
 Cross fostered, against rearing colony (n = 88) −0.117 0.068 0.086
*

Sample sizes differ in “Midparent, using offspring's natal-colony size as parental value,” because sex was unknown for some birds.